← all work classical-computer-vision

Wavelet denoising

[![Python 3.10+](https://img.shields.io/badge/python-3.10+-3776AB?logo=python&logoColor=white)](https://www.python.org/)

Result

SrSceneGaussian**Bilateral**VisuShrink softBayesShrink soft
1black panther · sparsity 0.78824.54**26.08**20.3923.82
2warthogs drinking · sparsity 0.85526.44**27.41**22.5725.29
3cormorants nesting · sparsity 0.92125.91**28.16**22.5125.55
4taj mahal reflected · sparsity 0.94725.52**28.15**22.1925.63

The finding

The premise, measured before anything depends on it

The gap is real and large. A perfectly flat spectrum would put 0.10 in the top 10%; noise scores 0.44 because the largest samples of a Gaussian are still larger than the rest, and every photograph scores 0.69 or above. **Thresholding really can separate them.**

That is what makes the result interesting rather than disappointing: the method's justification is sound, and the Haar basis is still not a good enough one.

---

Figures

methods.png
methods

Elsewhere

Code and full results on GitHub (code private)

Every number is read from the file the run produced. github.com/hammasbuilds · kaggle.com/muhammadhammas13